Embracing AI in Economic Testimony: Integrating Tools with Caution and Validation
Articles / Research Papers
Economic testimony occupies a unique intersection of
economics, law, and empirical rigor. The work of expert
witnesses, especially in high-stakes commercial litigation,
demands a careful blend of analytic precision, domain
knowledge, and persuasive communication. Traditionally, this
effort has depended on teams of analysts, associates, and
support staff, with the expert serving as both architect and
final author of the damages model or valuation opinion.
The rapid emergence of generative artificial intelligence
(AI), particularly large language models (LLMs), presents a
profound disruption to this paradigm. While not themselves
experts, LLMs can perform a growing array of linguistic,
mathematical, and logical tasks. This has led to their
adoption as “junior associates” in a variety of legal and
financial settings. In the realm of expert testimony, these
tools offer real opportunities for increased efficiency but
also present risks of overreliance, lack of methodological
transparency, and confusion about how evidence or
knowledge is interpreted and validated.
Author: Richard J. Eichmann, CVA, MAFF
Visit ResourceRate This Resource
Click a star to rate (1-5, with 5 being the best)
Information Summary
Created
10/1/2025
Last Edited
11/5/2025
Tested
11/5/2025
Content Type
Articles / Research Papers
Category
How to Use AI
Usage Type
Freemium
Report Problems or Issues
Found something wrong with this page? Let us know.
Report Submitted Successfully
Thank you for your feedback. We'll look into it.
Submission Failed
There was an error submitting the form. Please try again.